Texas teachers face a legal paradox this school year. Two new state laws—one promoting religious displays, the other banning DEI programs—are placing educators in the crosshairs of contradictory expectations and looming lawsuits. Here’s what that means for the classroom.
The Legal Battleground Takes Shape
Senate Bill 10 requires every public school classroom to display the Ten Commandments starting September 2025. The mandate affects nearly 6 million students across 9,100 schools.
But the opposition runs deeper than expected. Christian parents and ministers have joined lawsuits against the law. One Christian minister argues the displays conflict with his religious beliefs by “implying that anyone who does not believe in the state’s official religious scripture is an outsider.”
Meanwhile, Senate Bill 12 bans diversity, equity, and inclusion programs while restricting discussions about gender identity and sexual orientation. The ACLU of Texas has filed suit, challenging both the constitutionality and practical implementation of these restrictions.
The legal precedent looks shaky. Louisiana’s similar Ten Commandments law was unanimously blocked by a federal appeals court in June 2025.
What This Means for Classroom Teachers
The contradiction creates an untenable situation. Teachers must simultaneously display specific religious content while maintaining inclusive environments for students from diverse faith backgrounds.
Consider the practical challenges. Texas serves students from dozens of religious traditions, plus those from non-religious families. The law requires a specific English translation despite the fact that interpretations vary across denominations and languages.
Teachers now face potential discipline or termination for DEI-related activities. But what constitutes a DEI activity remains unclear. Does celebrating different cultural holidays count? What about acknowledging students’ varied family structures?
The enforcement mechanism puts educators in impossible positions. School districts must adopt policies to discipline employees who “knowingly participate” in prohibited activities. Yet the boundaries of these activities remain legally undefined.
The Classroom Reality Check
Elementary teachers wonder how to explain concepts like adultery to curious students. Middle school educators question whether discussing historical civil rights movements might trigger DEI violations. High school teachers debate whether college prep discussions about campus diversity programs could cost them their jobs.
The poster requirement alone creates logistical headaches. Each display must measure at least 16 by 20 inches and contain only the specific language outlined in the bill. No other similar posters are allowed, limiting teachers’ ability to balance the religious content with secular or multicultural materials.
Student questions become legal minefields. When a second-grader asks why the classroom poster mentions God but their family doesn’t believe in God, teachers must navigate religious sensitivity while complying with state mandates.
The Waiting Game Creates More Problems
Legal uncertainty compounds daily classroom decisions. Teachers implement policies knowing courts may invalidate them within months. This creates a culture of hesitation where educators second-guess every lesson plan and wall decoration.
Professional development becomes complicated. Districts must train teachers on compliance while acknowledging the laws face constitutional challenges. Resources get diverted from curriculum development to legal consultation.
The chilling effect extends beyond the specific restrictions. Teachers report self-censoring discussions about literature, history, and current events to avoid potential violations. This cautious approach ultimately limits educational quality.
Moving Forward in Uncertain Territory
Teachers need practical strategies for navigating this legal maze. Focus on curriculum standards and documented educational objectives. Keep detailed records of lesson plans and classroom discussions. When student questions arise about sensitive topics, redirect to parents and families for personal guidance.
Professional organizations recommend consulting district legal counsel before implementing any activities that might touch on restricted areas. Document all decisions and maintain clear educational justifications for classroom materials and discussions.
The legal challenges will likely reach higher courts, potentially including the Supreme Court. Teachers must balance current compliance requirements with the possibility of future policy reversals.
Smart educators are building flexible lesson plans that can adapt to changing legal requirements. They’re developing parent communication strategies that keep families informed about classroom policies and their legal basis.
The Bigger Picture for Education
These legal battles reflect broader tensions about public education’s role in American society. Teachers find themselves implementing policies that significant portions of their communities oppose, including members of the religious groups the laws claim to support.
The financial implications extend beyond legal fees. Districts must allocate resources to compliance training, legal consultation, and policy development rather than direct educational services. These costs ultimately impact classroom resources and student programs.
Teacher retention could suffer as educators leave for states with clearer, more stable policy environments. Texas already faces teacher shortages in many districts. Adding legal uncertainty and potential career risks may accelerate departures.
The student impact remains the most concerning aspect. When teachers focus on legal compliance over educational excellence, learning suffers. When classroom environments become tense due to restricted discussions, student engagement declines.
Texas teachers deserve clarity, support, and policies that help rather than hinder their educational mission. Until the legal challenges resolve, educators must navigate an unprecedented landscape where good teaching and legal compliance may sometimes conflict.
The ultimate question remains whether these laws will survive judicial review. Until then, teachers continue doing what they do best: adapting, improvising, and putting student needs first despite impossible circumstances.
Back To School: Two Important Factors to Consider(Opens in a new browser tab)
Jacob Maslow writes about legal and educational issues affecting American families. He also publishes practical classroom tools and ESL worksheets for teachers and parents at TeachersInstruction.com.
Discussion about this post