You have undoubtedly discovered that many options are available today for noninvasive, nonsurgical fat-loss techniques. Among the most common are Ultrasound Cavitation and Cryolipolysis.
This article examines the similarities and differences between these treatments. This article will help you choose the best therapy for your body contouring requirements.
What is Ultrasound Cavitation?
Technically referred to as ultrasonic or ultrasound cavitation, this method is the primary substitute for liposuction. Ultrasound cavitation uses low-frequency ultrasonic pulses to break up fat deposits.
It eliminates fat without needing anaesthesia, surgery, hospitalisation, or a recuperation period that interferes with day-to-day activities, making it a desirable fat-loss treatment.
What Is Cryolipolysis?
Another contemporary fat-loss procedure that has gained popularity as an alternative to surgery is fat freezing, also known as cryolipolysis. This non-invasive technique achieves a localised fat reduction process that can target stubborn fat deposits by freezing and destroying the fat cells using CoolSculpting technology.
Like cavitation, fat freezing eliminates the need for surgery, anaesthesia, and a rigid recuperation time. As a result, patients can usually resume their regular activities without interruption, but rest is advised following the procedure.
How Does Ultrasound Cavitation Work?
Despite its somewhat complicated appearance, high performing cavitation machines is a straightforward process. Ultrasound waves with a frequency of 1 MHZ penetrate the skin and reach the layer of fat beneath.
The pressure and vibrations produced by these waves cause the fat cells to rupture, releasing liquid glycerol and fatty acids. The body then eliminates the fatty acids and recycles the glycerol. A tiny quantity of heat the ultrasonic wave produces enhances circulation and expedites trash elimination.
Whether your goal is to tone problem areas or lose body fat, generally, everyone has distinct weight reduction objectives. Because of this, cavitation treatment plans are tailored to your specific requirements and can work around your schedule.
Plans usually include two nonsurgical treatments per week for one to two months. The initial results will begin to show within a few days of finishing the first session. About ten sessions are required for the best benefits, though this will differ for each patient.
How Does Cryolipolysis Work?
Fat freezing is a straightforward process that does exactly what it sounds like. When applied to a fat area, CoolSculpting paddles gently and safely impart cold temperatures to the skin. Depending on the method used, the fat layer is progressively cooled to the desired temperature of 5 to -6 degrees Celsius.
Cold temperatures that reach about 2 cm below the skin’s surface freeze the fat cells beneath the skin to death. The lymphatic system then eliminates the remaining pieces of these cells.
Although the duration of the treatment program varies depending on the client, the treatment is often finished in one to four sessions. The full results take one to three months.
What Is the Difference Between Cavitation and Fat Freezing?
Although the two techniques are comparable in that they both eliminate and decrease fat cells without surgery, their approaches are considerably different.
Fat-freezing procedures aim to safely and carefully kill fat cells by ‘freezing’ them away. Just as a person needs ideal conditions to survive, fat cells, too, need ideal settings. An FDA-approved device can target fat cells, lowering their temperature and killing them.
The body’s lymphatic system then begins eliminating the dead cells as part of the body’s natural defence mechanism.
Cavitation employs a similar strategy and seeks to modify the ideal living circumstances of the fat cell. The primary distinction is that fat cells are heated using high-frequency sound waves approved by the FDA, which causes them to liquefy.
The melted fat cells are once more evacuated by the body’s lymphatic system, which then carries them to the liver to be processed before the body naturally eliminates them as waste. What else distinguishes these treatments, though?
Which treatment yields better outcomes with fewer sessions?
However, fat-freezing procedures take about four sessions to show their best effects. In contrast, cavitation produces immediate results, providing a noticeable difference after just one session.
Fat-freezing depends on extremely low temperatures, which gradually kill the fat cells. The initial damage to the cells sets off an inflammatory response, which causes them to degrade progressively and eventually die. Thus, achieving this good outcome will take one to three months.
But with cavitation, you may immediately notice a difference. Ultrasonic waves heat fat cells to such a high temperature during therapy that they liquefy. To further ‘chisel’ and thin the overall appearance, the high-performing cavitation machine also aids tissue breakdown in the treated areas.
It is important to remember that both operations have long-lasting effects, particularly when paired with an active lifestyle. This should give you confidence in the lasting benefits of your investment in these treatments.
What is the most comfortable course of treatment?
When the two procedures are contrasted, ultrasound cavitation is commonly believed to be less painful than fat freezing. The former is often described as painless and even calming. This feeling results from the process’s heating component, which ‘melts’ the fat cells away. More significantly, no incisions are needed, and no anaesthetic is required.
However, fat freezing may cause additional discomfort. Patients frequently mention the device’s extreme coolness and the tingling and stinging sensation it produces. The sensations go away when the area gets cold enough to become numb. Patients have reported experiencing mild redness, discomfort, and bruises following the surgery, but these are all short-term.
It should be emphasised once more that both medications have FDA approval, providing you with the assurance of their safety and efficacy.
Are the costs of these procedures different?
It is generally accepted that ultrasonic cavitation procedures are 30–50% less expensive than fat freezing. However, this could differ from clinic to clinic. We strongly advise looking for a centre registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) when deciding where to receive your treatment option.
Do these operations necessitate lengthy recovery and rest periods?
Patients who choose a fat-freezing treatment are advised to take it easy following the surgery. Resting is the best action for long-term recuperation because some individuals report feeling sore from the gadget. Given the previously mentioned uncommon risk of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia, allowing two to five months for a full recovery is advisable. You should not, however, endure any chronic discomfort during this period. After your treatment session, side effects frequently last for a few weeks.
On the other hand, you can finish an ultrasonic cavitation session during your lunch break. Thanks to this easy technique, you can resume regular activities without any worries.
Conclusion
The objective of noninvasive body contouring techniques like fat freezing and ultrasonic cavitation is to reduce fat cells and create a leaner shape. While fat freezing operates by freezing fat cells, which are gradually removed from your body like cavitation, ultrasonic cavitation uses ultrasonic frequencies to eliminate fat cells.
The treatments are excellent choices because they are quick and don’t require a long recovery. Results from fat-freezing therapies can take up to three months to manifest and are typically more costly than cavitation.
Furthermore, the fat-freezing procedure does not tighten the skin; its benefits are limited to targeted areas. However, skin tightening can also be achieved with ultrasonic fat cavitation, so some patients may benefit from combining the two techniques.
